The Hearing

Public, on the record, and heard by a panel that includes members of your own profession. It is the part everyone imagines and the part fewest files ever reach.

Start My Enquiry →

Public HearingTwo StagesPenaltyCosts

Disclosure | Agreed Statement | Finding | Penalty | Appeal

Four features that surprise people.

Hearings are generally open to the public, and decisions are published.

The panel includes members of your profession, not only lawyers.

Finding and penalty are argued separately, often on different days.

A costs order against the professional is common and can be substantial.

Quick Answer

What happens at a professional discipline hearing in Ontario?

A discipline hearing is an administrative proceeding, not a trial, but it is conducted formally. The regulator states allegations, discloses its case, and calls evidence. The professional may contest the allegations or admit them, usually through an agreed statement of facts negotiated in advance. The panel, which includes members of the profession alongside public members, decides whether the allegations are proved on a balance of probabilities. If any are, the hearing moves to a separate penalty stage where both sides make submissions on sanction. Available penalties generally include a reprimand, terms conditions and limitations on the certificate, suspension, revocation, a fine payable to the Minister of Finance, and an order for costs. Appeals lie to the Divisional Court.

Ontario law · Reviewed by Lexaltico LLP, Toronto · Arrange a consultation

Start My Enquiry

Speak to a Regulatory Defence Lawyer

Tell us briefly what is going on. A lawyer reviews every enquiry and replies within 2 business days.

A lawyer replies within 2 business days. Urgent? Call +1 416 333 6200, answered 24/7. Submitting this form does not create a solicitor-client relationship.

BEFORE THE HEARING

Disclosure, and the Negotiation That Usually Avoids a Contest

The regulator must disclose the case it intends to make. That disclosure is the first realistic opportunity to assess the file properly, because until then you are responding to allegations without seeing everything behind them.

Most matters that reach discipline resolve by agreement rather than by contested hearing. The mechanism is an agreed statement of facts, sometimes with a joint submission on penalty. The facts are admitted, the panel makes findings on those facts, and the hearing becomes short and predictable.

That negotiation is where most of the value is. What goes into the agreed statement, and what is left out, shapes the finding and therefore the penalty and the published decision that will be read for years. A joint submission on penalty also carries real weight, because a panel that departs from one has to explain itself against a high threshold.

THE PANEL

Judged by People Who Do Your Job

A discipline panel is not a judge sitting alone. It includes members of the profession together with public members appointed to represent the public interest, and it is supported by independent legal counsel who advises on procedure and law but does not decide.

That composition cuts both ways. Professional members understand context that a court would need explained: why a decision was reasonable under pressure, what the practical realities of a busy practice are, what the standard actually is rather than what it looks like in a textbook.

They are also harder to mislead. A professional explanation that would satisfy a lay decision maker will not survive a panel member who has made the same decision themselves, and an attempt to dress up a shortcut as a judgement call tends to fail badly.

TWO STAGES

Finding First, Then Penalty

The hearing decides liability first. Did the conduct occur, and does it amount to professional misconduct or incompetence as defined by the governing statute and regulations. The standard of proof is the civil one, a balance of probabilities, and not the criminal standard.

If nothing is proved, the matter ends. If something is proved, the hearing moves to penalty, frequently on a later date, and both sides make submissions. This is a genuinely separate argument and it is often where the outcome that matters is decided.

Penalty submissions turn on the seriousness of the conduct, whether it was an isolated lapse or a pattern, the professional insight shown, remediation already undertaken, prior history, and the range of penalties imposed in comparable published cases. That last point is why the published decisions of your own regulator matter so much: discipline panels work from precedent within the profession.

PENALTY AND COSTS

What a Panel Can Order

A reprimand, delivered in person and recorded. Terms, conditions and limitations on the certificate of registration, which can require supervision, restrict scope of practice, or mandate education. Suspension for a defined period. Revocation, which is the end of the licence.

A fine payable to the Minister of Finance, in an amount set by the governing statute. Publication of the decision with or without the professional named, though naming is the norm.

Costs. This is the item professionals consistently underestimate. Where allegations are proved a panel can order the professional to pay a contribution to the regulator investigation and hearing costs, and in a contested multi day hearing that figure can exceed the fine several times over. It is one of the strongest practical arguments for resolving a matter that is genuinely going to be proved.

APPEALS

To the Divisional Court

A decision of a discipline committee can generally be appealed to the Divisional Court, which sits as a panel of three judges. The appeal is on the record rather than a fresh hearing, and the court is not there to substitute its own view of the evidence.

Findings of fact and questions squarely within the panel expertise attract deference. Appeals succeed most often on questions of law, a denial of procedural fairness, or a penalty demonstrably outside the acceptable range rather than merely one the appellant dislikes.

Appeal periods are short and are set by the governing statute. An appeal also does not automatically stay a suspension, so where the penalty takes effect immediately a separate motion for a stay may be needed, and that is a matter of days rather than weeks.

Common Questions

Frequently Asked Questions

Is a discipline hearing public?

Generally yes. Hearings are usually open and decisions are published, ordinarily naming the professional. Limited exceptions exist, most often to protect a patient or client identity.

What is the standard of proof?

The civil standard, a balance of probabilities. It is not the criminal standard of beyond a reasonable doubt.

Can I resolve the matter without a contested hearing?

Usually. Most discipline matters resolve through an agreed statement of facts, often with a joint submission on penalty, which a panel will not lightly depart from.

Will I have to pay the regulator costs?

Frequently, where allegations are proved. In a contested hearing a costs order can exceed the fine several times over, which is a significant factor in deciding whether to contest.

Who decides the case?

A panel including members of your own profession alongside public members, advised by independent legal counsel who does not vote.

Can I appeal?

Generally to the Divisional Court, on the record. Appeals succeed most often on questions of law, procedural fairness, or a penalty outside the acceptable range.

Start My Enquiry

Talk to Us About a Discipline Referral

Bring the notice of hearing and the allegations as stated. The negotiation before the hearing is usually where the outcome is decided.

Your name

Email address

Phone

Best time to reach you

Briefly, what is happening?

A few questions about your regulatory & discipline defence matter optional

None of these are required and your enquiry sends without them. They let the lawyer read your situation before the call rather than during it.

Which regulator or college is involved? optionalFor example the LSO, CPSO, CPA Ontario, RECO, or a municipal licensing body.

Where has it got to? optional

Is there a date you have been given to respond by? optionalA response deadline from a regulator is usually short and rarely extended. If you have one, it decides how quickly we need to speak.

Have you replied to them already? optionalThere is no wrong answer here. It changes what can still be done, not whether we can help.

Please do not send confidential documents or details through this form. We will ask for what we need once we have spoken and confirmed we can act for you.

Confidential and no obligation. We reply within 2 business days. You can call +1 416 333 6200 instead if you would rather speak to someone now.

Lexaltico LLP

Downtown Toronto

55 University Ave, Suite 1100
Toronto, ON M5J 2H7

North York

2 Sheppard Ave East, Suite 303, Toronto, ON M2N 5Y7

Phone

+1 416 333 6200

Hours

Monday to Friday: 9:00 AM to 5:00 PM
Evenings & weekends by appointment

Call for an Initial Assessment →

Start My Enquiry

Ready to Talk? Start My Enquiry

No obligation. We will tell you honestly whether we can help.

A lawyer replies within 2 business days. Urgent? Call +1 416 333 6200, answered 24/7. Submitting this form does not create a solicitor-client relationship.

Start My Enquiry

Call Message

The Hearing

What happens at a professional discipline hearing in Ontario?

Speak to a Regulatory Defence Lawyer

Disclosure, and the Negotiation That Usually Avoids a Contest

Judged by People Who Do Your Job

Finding First, Then Penalty

What a Panel Can Order

To the Divisional Court

Frequently Asked Questions

Talk to Us About a Discipline Referral

Lexaltico LLP

Ready to Talk? Start My Enquiry

Related pages